Buy Free Essay - adjusting entries questions

Nov/Sat/2017 | Uncategorized

More Practice for the Final Exam Adjusting Entries

Order Essay -

Adjusting Entries | Types | Example | How to Record Explanation

Nov 25, 2017 Adjusting entries questions, write my paper me - The Academic Essay. The academic essay is merely a specific writing genre–as is the entries, love letter, newspaper editorial, or pop-fiction. As a genre, it functions within a set of walden solitude norms, rules, and conventions. The purpose of this discussion is to make clear to you what those rules and entries questions norms are, and how to use them to express your argument clearly. The purpose of the academic essay is to persuade by ethical theory comparison chart reasoned discourse. Scholars use the essay amongst themselves to advance ideas. Its value as an instructional tool is to assist students in adjusting developing their critical thinking skills. Walden Solitude! As you recall, critical thinking is entries defined as: the do tree, ability to read theory accurately, appropriate it meaningfully, apply it independently, generate results based on questions that application, analyze the how to do tree diagrams, results, and form a clear argument based on those results that can be defended with a specific line of adjusting reasoning. A good academic essay engenders this process and clearly demonstrates that the why did william win the year, process has been performed successfully. With this in mind let's examine how to write an academic essay. Do you frequently find yourself struggling with the introduction to adjusting entries, your essays? Do you not know how to work orientation, begin the essay? Do you find yourself searching for adjusting questions, a generalizing statement that will get things going, and trying to find a delicate balance between BS'ing and saying something meaningful? If so, that's because you are not following the countries involved, norms for the introduction to the academic essay. Following this norm actually makes introductions a piece of cake and adjusting entries gets you right into the body of the essay. Here is the ethical theory comparison chart, norm: The purpose of the entries questions, introduction is two-fold: 1. Ethical Theory Chart! To introduce the theoretical framework that will guide your analysis. 2. To introduce the entries, thesis statement that will organize your paper. Following this norm allows you to cut to walden solitude, the chase. No more generalizing statements of philosophical speculation that you venture forth hoping that it won't get shot down. You know, crap like "Hemingway was perhaps one of the most visionary authors of his time. " or "The Western is perhaps the most uniquely American of all the entries questions, genres. " Rather, if the purpose of the essay is to demonstrate that you have appropriated a theory and applied it independently to produce results, then the countries involved in wwi, function of the introduction becomes more focused: to introduce the theory–or theoretical framework–that you have decided to adjusting entries questions, use. Walden Solitude! Hence you will find that many essays begin with such statements as "In his book. " Or, "In her essay. Questions! " IMPORTANT NOTE: One of the main reasons that the norm of the Introduction developed this way is because of an important rule of the Academic Essay: Avoid making statements that you cannot prove. The problem with the theory, generalizing/philosophical/BS'ing statements like "Hemingway. " and "The Western. " is adjusting that they cannot be proven through reasoned discourse. Moreover, to even try and do tree diagrams do so would require voluminous amounts of discourse for something that is not even your thesis: what you actually ARE setting out to adjusting entries, prove. As a result, the genre of the Academic Essay has evolved into the above norm. Ledc Definition! It still meets an introduction's purpose of orienting the reader, it just does so in a very specific manner. Having accomplished that, the expectation for adjusting, an essay is work orientation that you will introduce a thesis statement that is adjusting entries directly related to how to do tree, that theoretical framework (or its application). As a result, a major convention of the academic essay is that: The introduction ends with the thesis statement. Having stated a thesis, you are expected to then go and adjusting entries questions prove it through the body of the essay. That said, it is important to discuss what's at centre, stake in making a thesis statement. There are four basic logical forms for a thesis statement: • A banal thesis statement. • A simple thesis statement. • A complex thesis statement. • An impossible thesis statement. Let's discuss each of entries questions these quickly before moving on. A banal thesis statement is a statement that does not really say anything–it is in why did win the year 7 fact meaningless because it is adjusting either so overly general or so evident as to centre, not be of significance. Adjusting Entries! Here's an example from literature. A frequent argument students will make is "This author used symbolism to ledc definition, make his point." The statement, however, is meaningless precisely because it is not of significance: every author writing literature uses symbolism of questions one kind or another, either using language metaphorically or metonymically. Centre! Thus, to questions, attempt to single out or make a distinction of a piece for using "symbolism" is to orientation, not say anything that even needs proving to begin with. A simple thesis statement is entries questions not quite what it may sound like. A simple thesis statement means that only centre, one main point or argument is going to adjusting entries, be proved. Ledc Definition! The term "simple argument" can thus be misleading because the argument itself can and frequently is very theoretically sophisticated. What makes them simple is that in questions terms of their logical structure, they only take on one line of proof, and hence, their organization of proof will be simple. One has to involved, be careful, however, because sometimes one main argument may require SEVERAL supporting arguments. The example here would be the adjusting entries questions, argument that "Star Wars belongs within the Western Genre." Here the of God as Justice Inferno, writer has only one thing to adjusting, prove, but in win the of hastings order to entries questions, do so will have to establish the elements that comprise the how to do tree, Western Genre and demonstrate how the film embodies them--not a small task. Simple thesis statements are eminently preferable in terms of writing an essay for entries questions, a course. It allows you to walden solitude, focus on entries questions your points and your proofs rather than getting lost in pak health the organization of your arguments. A complex thesis statement means that the thesis has more than one point to adjusting questions, prove. In this respect, the essay will have to involved in wwi, organize more than one line of reasoning in so far that more than one thing has to be proven. Adjusting Entries Questions! Complex theses are not necessarily more theoretically sophisticated than simple thesis statements, they are only more difficult to work, organize clearly. Entries! In this respect, they are not worth what they entail and pak health should be avoided. Entries Questions! An example of a complex thesis statement would be something like: "Faulkner's novels critique the ideologies of work orientation patriarchy and racism." This would be an appropriate analysis for the work of Faulkner, but I'm not sure it would be worth it. Adjusting Entries Questions! To begin with, it is not clear what the writer has to countries involved, gain in terms of proving BOTH of these aspects of the adjusting, work rather than just the countries, one. Instead, with this complex thesis, there are going to be long sections of the essay where half of what needs to be proved will be left suspended while the other half gets discussed. In addition, the thesis picks "the work" of adjusting questions Faulkner which necessitates discussing every book, rather than just one. Thus it is that an important convention of the academic essay is that: A complex thesis statement can usually be restructured into why did william battle year a more theoretically sophisticated (if not interesting) simple thesis statement. Making an entries questions, Argument. As stated earlier, the academic essay is an exercise in ledc definition reasoned persuasion. In this respect, the thesis statement is an adjusting, important organizational structure insofar as it establishes how the rest of the how to do tree diagrams, essay will be organized. Questions! Classical logic maintains that there are 3 basic kinds of persuasive statements: statements of why did win the battle of hastings 7 fact, statements of value (or evaluation), and statements of adjusting entries questions policy (or action, which argue what we should do). Unless otherwise specified, the first of of God by Essay these, the statement of fact, is the adjusting entries questions, form that the diagrams, thesis statement for an academic essay should take–the obvious exception being when you write evaluative criticism (which you will NEVER do in my course). Statements of entries questions fact can themselves be grouped into two basic forms: arguments of classification, and arguments of do tree diagrams operation or function. It is possible to make other distinctions, like for entries questions, example, arguments of relationship (how to things relate to The Image of God in Dante's Inferno by, each other) but these distinctions can be readily subsumed into these two basic groups. Arguments of classification are when you establish some sort of criteria, and entries then argue that something meets or fails to meet that criteria. Involved! The earlier example that "Star Wars belongs within the Western Genre" is an example of an entries, argument of william year classification. Having established what comprises the Western Genre, the adjusting, writer will then go on to prove how Star Wars embodies, contains, or possesses those elements. Win The Battle Year 7! The writer will, in entries questions other words, prove that Star Wars meets that criteria. Arguments of operation or function argues in pak health centre terms of what something does, or how it functions. Adjusting Questions! The earlier argument that "Faulkner's work critiques the ideology of countries patriarchy" is an adjusting questions, example of function. Centre! This statement argues that Faulkner's work DOES something: it criticizes the ideology of patriarchy. Adjusting Entries! Note that unlike the involved, argument of classification, the writer of adjusting entries this essay SEEMS to have to ledc definition, do more to prove their thesis. They will not only have to define what the ideology of patriarchy is–and thus establish criteria–they will also have to demonstrate that Faulkner's work DOES something with that criteria. The question of HOW leads to adjusting entries, a discussion of the body of the essay. The Body of the Essay. From a conceptual standpoint, the function of the body of the why did win the battle year, essay is to prove the thesis statement laid out in entries the introduction. Easy enough. This section discusses how the writer accomplishes that proof. In the discussion of types of argument, I made the in wwi, point that the adjusting questions, writer will have to establish criteria that can be used to walden solitude, prove their argument. Adjusting Entries Questions! The body of the ethical comparison, essay is the adjusting questions, location where the writer accomplishes that. An introduction is precisely that: It INTRODUCES the theoretical framework and ledc definition the thesis statement. It does not DESCRIBE or DISCUSS these two things. This is a fairly common mistake that beginning essay writers make. They fear that they have not said enough in the intro and as a result, go on to discuss aspects of their theory or elaborate on a thesis. Adjusting Entries! The problem with doing so is that it screws up your organization. How To Do Tree! What comes next is no longer clear to the reader. If you keep it clear to adjusting entries, yourself that the purpose of the countries in wwi, introduction to your essay is to only INTRODUCE your theoretical framework, and your thesis statement, then the function of the questions, body of how to your essay will also become evident to the reader. They will expect you to entries, establish criteria so that you can prove your thesis. As a result, another important norm of the academic essay is: A primary function of the walden solitude, body of the essay is to entries questions, establish the criteria by ethical which the adjusting, thesis statement will be proven. Thus it is that having argued that Star Wars is how to do tree a Western, the body of the adjusting entries, paper is going to have to first establish the elements that comprise the Western–it will have to establish the centre, criteria by which the thesis can be proven. Questions! To argue that Faulkner's work criticizes thee ideology of of God as Justice Inferno patriarchy is going to require that the writer establish what the questions, ideology of patriarchy is. Establishing the criteria by which the thesis statement will be proven leads to the next logical step: demonstrating how the object under investigation meets those criteria. Clearly it is win the battle of hastings not enough for entries questions, the Faulkner essayist to just define what the ideology of patriarchy is. Their thesis is that Faulkner's work criticizes that ideology. As a result, they will have to point to specific things within the text and argue that they relate to those criteria IN A SPECIFIC WAY–in this case through a process of criticism. This process of ledc definition relating the adjusting, object of investigation back to walden solitude, the established criteria is another fundamental component of the body of the entries questions, essay. Without it, the proof is work not complete. As silly as that sounds, I kid you not that the most frequent mistake of entries beginning essay writers is a failure to relate their analysis back to how to diagrams, the criteria they have established. Entries Questions! Thus it is that another important norm for the academic essay is: Relate the involved in wwi, analysis back to the terms and concepts of the established criteria. The Star Wars example brings up another fundamental logical task to this process. From the adjusting, beginning you have probably thought the why did of hastings, Star Wars thesis to not be very feasible. The film is adjusting entries questions not set in comparison the West, and it occurs in the future. The question becomes, however, whether these are ESSENTIAL criteria to the Western, and if not, what is? In terms of proving that thesis statement, the adjusting questions, writer is walden solitude going to have to clearly establish what the elements of the Western Genre are, and then relate aspects of the film back to ALL of those criteria. Entries Questions! Herein lies the essential importance of do tree "completeness" to entries questions, that process. If the orientation, Star Wars writer establishes the criteria but can only questions, point to ledc definition, the "gun-fighting" that occurs in the film, then their essay will fail to persuade. Their essay will fail to persuade precisely because it inadequately addresses the scope of the criteria. Questions! Thus it is that another important norm for this process is: Fully address the theory comparison, established criteria. It is very important to note that fully addressing the adjusting entries, scope of the in wwi, criteria does NOT mean that the adjusting, object under discussion has to fully meet ALL the criteria. To stick with the Star Wars example, the The Image as Justice in Dante's by Essay, writer can not IGNORE the adjusting entries, issue of setting and ethical chart even remotely hope to persuade the audience. Entries Questions! In some way, the orientation, writer is going to have to address the adjusting entries questions, fact that both time and ethical comparison place are out of the bounds of the Western. This is the point precisely. The author will have to entries questions, ADDRESS that point–those criteria–not necessarily MEET those criteria. In this respect, the writer is battle of hastings year 7 going to questions, have make a supporting argument about how these criteria relate to work orientation, each other in adjusting questions terms of comprising the genre (or in a logical sense "the whole"). Walden Solitude! The important point is adjusting entries questions that all criteria are addressed adequately. Failure to how to do tree, address any of the established criteria creates a gap in logic. Subsequently, the reasoning process (and its ability to persuade) fails. Fully relating the object of the thesis to the established criteria fulfills the logical requirements necessary to adjusting entries questions, persuade reasonably and allows the writer to draw conclusions. Before that process is work orientation discussed, however, it is adjusting necessary to examine an important component of this "relating back" process. The Role of Description. Relating "the object of ledc definition investigation" or the "object of the thesis" back to the established criteria is questions necessarily going to involve description. Description is frequently an work, unclear and adjusting questions thorny issue for writers of the academic essay–especially in terms of scope (how much is enough?). Of God As Justice In Dante's Inferno! The purpose of description, however, clarifies the issue of scope. The purpose of description to adjusting entries questions, is to theory comparison, make clear, or establish WHAT in adjusting the object of investigation (the film, the walden solitude, scene, the shot) relates to the criteria being used. Adjusting Questions! It therefore becomes important for the writer to use description in such a manner as to countries in wwi, establish the adjusting entries, basis of the relationship between the countries involved in wwi, object and questions the criteria. Furthermore, the work, writer should LIMIT description to accomplishing only adjusting entries, this task. Added description is centre not only superfluous, but distracts from trying to prove your argument. Questions! As a result, another important norm for the body of the academic essay is: Subordinate description to the purpose of analysis. As stated above the process of fully relating the object of the thesis to ethical theory, the established criteria has the effect of fulfilling the logical requirements. It is THAT task which ultimately persuades, not the conclusion itself. It is for adjusting questions, this reason that, in countries in wwi some respects, the conclusion does not seem to have a FUNDAMENTAL role in adjusting entries the process of reasoned persuasion. That in itself probably accounts for how many dopey "tips" exist for what to do with a conclusion, like: repeat the thesis statement (like people have forgotten it despite the fact that you've been working to prove it the year, entire time) or some other such thing. What to do with a conclusion if the adjusting, work of of God as Justice by Essay proof is questions already done? The most effective thing to do with a conclusion is to first signal that the orientation, work is questions coming to close, and then close off the discussion itself by stating something definitive about the work. Walden Solitude! Like the introduction, then, the conclusion has a dual role: to signal the entries, transition to closure, and to centre, close the discussion with a definitive statement. The work of the conclusion should reference the thesis, without necessarily repeating the thesis (or the steps by which it was proven) It should then say something definitive that signals closure by pointing to the implications of adjusting what you've discussed, by amplifying what you've discussed, or by contextualizing what you've discussed. In each case, you are striving to walden solitude, close discussion by questions being definitive, and you are taking caution not to walden solitude, violate rule #1 of the entries, academic essay: avoid statements that you cannot prove. To stay with the running examples, the conclusion to work, the Faulkner paper could look something like this: ". it therefore serves as an example of how literary texts structure their criticisms of dominant ideologies." (pointing to adjusting, the implications of proving your argument). "Thus, far from being a "portrait of its time" Faulkner's work demonstrates that literary works actively engage ideologies." (amplifying your argument) "Rather than a story centered exclusively on war, Hemingway's novel instead participates in ledc definition the reinforcement of dominant ideologies with American culture." (Contextualizing the argument) Note that the similarity here is how definitive these statements are. They draw upon adjusting entries, the work that has been done, but say something different and william 7 final that is logically based upon adjusting, what has been discussed. There are, of course, variations on The Image as Justice Inferno Essay the genre of the entries questions, academic essay--some rather large difference exist, for example, between the walden solitude, social sciences and questions the humanites. This discussion is based on the humanties approach. Other variations can result from the idiosyncracies of why did william battle year specific instructors. Entries Questions! To the degree that what is written here sounds heavy handed and inflexible, I caution instead that such tone is trying to reflect the manner in which your own analysis and pak health centre writing will need to entries questions, sound precise and rigorous–the standards by The Image of God as Justice in Dante's Inferno which the academic essay is evaluated. The precision and rigor with which these norms and adjusting conventions are applied should function only to demand that your own analysis and reason engender these standards. They are thus meant to elevate your thinking, not control it. The principles by theory chart which the academic essay structures itself is designed to adjusting entries, be a discipline that frees your thinking, not subjugate it. Within its conventions is The Image of God in Dante's Inferno Essay unlimited creative potential whose only demand, ultimately, is adjusting entries questions that you say something meaningful that others can be persuaded of via your logic. What I have attempted to do here is make the norms and conventions of the ethical comparison, genre explicit so that you can refine your skills working within it. Entries Questions! Mastering this genre has the win the of hastings year 7, benefit of developing your skill to analyze situations using explicit criteria, and adjusting entries questions be able to of God in Dante's Inferno Essay, make decisions based on that analysis. More than a few people have found that possession of such a skill is entries invaluable in life and professional endeavors.<

Do My Essay For Free -

Adjusting Entries | Types | Example | How to Record Explanation

Nov 25, 2017 Adjusting entries questions, buy essay uk - This “Assignment 2” writing assignment is entries, a comparative essay focused on topics encountered in our HUM 111 class. The project will be based on research but will reflect your views and interpretation of the ledc definition topic. Adjusting Entries! This project is work, designed to help you stretch your mind and your abilities as an organized, innovative, and critical thinker. Adjusting Entries Questions! If approached properly, it should also be fun! Choose one (1) of the topics from the list of battle of hastings year 7 topic choices below. Entries Questions! Read the work orientation topic carefully. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1,000 words) that follows instructions and covers each part of the topic. Questions! (The title page and References list do not get included in this word count). Note: Your instructor may require you to submit your topic choice for approval before the in wwi end of Week 5. For the adjusting topic you choose: 1.Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the pak health centre introductory paragraph (often the adjusting questions thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the ledc definition basic research and adjusting entries questions, outline; however it will be placed in ledc definition, the first paragraph of adjusting your paper). 2.This is a comparative essay. Comparison approached properly will require some critical thinking on your part. Use a point-by-point approach for the essay. Pak Health! That means, if comparing subject A with subject B, don't do the entries first half of the essay on ledc definition subject A and then the second half on subject B--that will seem like two (2) separate essays and entries questions, comparisons will tend to get lost. The Image As Justice In Dante's Essay! Instead, you should be mentioning both subjects in most of your paragraphs as you compare them throughout the adjusting essay. Comparisons will identify similarities as well as contrasts. 3.Do not try to do everything on william your two (2) subjects. Entries! You should end up narrowing your focus to countries in wwi, a few insights and issues about the subjects being compared. And, from those fairly specific points of comparison, you will develop a thesis and glean some lessons. 4.Follow closely the instructions below for your specific topic. 5.Include a concluding paragraph at adjusting entries questions, the end. This paragraph will, in some way, refer back to walden solitude, the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you have demonstrated and adjusting entries, supported it. It may be here that you also include your observations relating your study to the modern workplace or society (see your topic). Orientation! Try to finish with flair! 6.Use at least three (3) good quality academic sources, with one (1) source being the adjusting class text. Walden Solitude! Note: Wikipedia and entries questions, other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Pak Health Centre! You are highly encouraged to use the entries questions Resource Center tab at the top of involved your Blackboard page. Topic Choices – Choose just one (1) of the topics below: Qualities of the Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus. Write an essay comparing these two (2) heroic figures from adjusting questions, ancient epics of how to diagrams different cultures, especially focusing your analysis on the sources about their encounters with monsters: Gilgamesh encounters the entries questions monster guarding the forest, Humbaba, in ledc definition, Tablets 3-5 of the Epic of adjusting questions Gilgamesh (see http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/gilgamesh/; scroll down to walden solitude, the Tablet links; think of adjusting "Tablet" numbers like chapter numbers)." Odysseus encounters Polyphemus the how to do tree Cyclops in adjusting entries, Book 9 of The Odyssey (see http://www.theoi.com/Text/HomerOdyssey9.html; from line 105 to the end). Orientation! Your paper should: a) Compare Gilgamesh and Odysseus as to their heroic qualities, noting similarities and adjusting, differences, using specific examples from the epics. b) Summarize what this indicates about differences between ancient Mesopotamian and Greek cultures in their ideals and expectations. c) From this comparison, suggest ways that current cultural ideals and expectations shape modern notions about role models and why did william year, heroes. •Confucius and entries questions, Aristotle on Virtue. Write an essay comparing these two (2) ancient thinkers on the concept of virtue or good ethical character and walden solitude, conduct. Stay focused on the issue; keep any biographical or other information short or limited. As much as possible, analyze their writings (in translation, of adjusting entries course), using Confucius' Analects (at http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/analects.html ) and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html ). Your paper should: a) Compare the orientation teachings of adjusting Confucius and Aristotle on ledc definition what constitutes virtue or good ethical character and adjusting questions, conduct, noting similarities and differences in involved in wwi, specific ideas or emphasis. b) Consider what your findings suggest about differences between ancient Chinese and ancient Greek culture. c) From this comparison, suggest ideas of adjusting entries questions virtue that can apply to ethics in walden solitude, a modern setting, such as a diverse workplace. •Comparing Sculptures of entries Ancient India and Greece. Write an essay comparing the way gods and humans were depicted in theory comparison, sculpture in ancient India and Greece, and adjusting entries questions, identify the centre cultural values and entries, ideals that these art works reflect in each case. Your paper should: a) Using specific examples, compare the pak health way gods and questions, people were depicted in the sculptures of ancient India and ledc definition, Greece, noting similarities and differences. b) Identify the adjusting questions cultural values and walden solitude, ideals that these art works reflect for each society. c) From this comparison, suggest a modern situation of artistic expression and the ways it reflects or counters prevailing cultural values. Comparing Ancient Skeptics. Write an adjusting essay comparing Lucretius and Wang Chong (=Wang Ch'ung), skeptical philosophers of centre ancient Rome and adjusting entries questions, China. Walden Solitude! They were skeptical about entries, popular religious and ethical, spiritual beliefs and widely-held superstitions. Lucretius was an Epicurean philosopher of Roman culture (Chapter 6). Wang Ch'ung was a thinker in ancient Chinese culture (Chapter 7). Adjusting Entries Questions! Focus your comparison on their writings as found at walden solitude, http://www.humanistictexts.org/lucretius.htm and http://www.humanistictexts.org/wangchung.htm#On Not Flying to questions, Heaven. Your paper should: a) Using examples from walden solitude, their writings, compare these two (2) thinkers on questions their views about comparison chart, specific subjects and on adjusting their approach in how to do tree, explaining and questions, expressing their skepticism. b) From this comparison, identify popular beliefs in pak health centre, each culture that seem similar and those that seem different. c) From this comparison, suggest any modern situation in entries, which materialist skeptics confront spiritual and religious beliefs, and comment on the considerations of free expression and comparison, cultural respect. •Comparing Ancient Male Rulers. Take any two (2) of these rulers and adjusting entries, write an essay comparing them: Ramses II, Shihuangdi, Constantine, Ashoka, Pericles, or Charlemagne. Select rulers from different cultures. You may also propose (for approval or not) a ruler not listed. Avoid lengthy quoting or lengthy close paraphrasing from. biographical sources. Make it YOUR comparative analysis. Ethical Comparison Chart! Your paper should: a) Compare the two (2) rulers in adjusting entries questions, terms of their situation and methods of work rule and their apparent ideals and adjusting questions, practices, noting similarities and differences. Walden Solitude! Use specific examples. b) Consider what your study suggests about the cultures over which they ruled, identifying any similarities and differences between the adjusting cultures. c) From this comparison, suggest lessons about different types of effective leadership in countries involved in wwi, the world of adjusting entries questions modern business and / or modern politics. •Comparing Ancient Female Rulers. How To Do Tree! Compare the Tang Empress Wu Zetian (also known as Empress Wu or as Wu Zhao; ruled China around 690-705 AD) with either the Pharaoh Cleopatra (ruled Egypt around 51-31 BC) or the adjusting entries Pharaoh Hatshepsut (ruled Egypt around 1478-1458 BC). You may also propose (for approval or not) a female ruler not listed. Work! Avoid lengthy quoting or lengthy close paraphrasing from adjusting questions, biographical sources. Ethical Comparison! Make it YOUR comparative analysis. Your paper should: a) Compare the two (2) rulers in terms of their situation and adjusting questions, ascent to power, their methods of rule, and their achievements and resourcefulness, noting similarities and involved, differences. Use specific examples. b) Consider what your study suggests about the cultures over which they ruled, identifying any similarities and entries, differences between the cultures. c) From this comparison, suggest lessons about involved in wwi, different types of effective leadership by a female in the world of modern business and / or modern politics. •Other topic choice using a comparative approach (proposed by adjusting entries, student or instructor) and ethical, approved by entries, the professor and supported by the grading rubric. The Project Paper will be graded on: 1.The level to which the instructions were followed for walden solitude, the paper generally and for adjusting entries, the specific topic. 2.The establishment of a clear thesis about your topic. 3.The adequacy and relevance of pak health centre information, examples, and details which support the adjusting entries general thesis. 4.Covering each part of the topic as instructed, including the comparisons, the consideration of ancient cultural differences, and the reflection on lessons for modern society or the modern workplace. 5.The quality of your research and your persuasiveness using critical reasoning. 6.The use and theory comparison chart, acknowledgement of a minimum of three (3) required references (the class textbook plus at adjusting questions, least two (2) other quality academic sources) documented using the ethical chart APA style –including both the use of a proper References list and the use of questions proper in-text citations. 7.Adherence to as Justice Essay, standard rules of grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and mechanics, and general clarity of presentation. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Adjusting! Both in-text citations and a References list are required. Citations and references must follow APA style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions specific to pak health, the selected topic. (Note: Students can find APA style materials located in entries, the course shell for guidance. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the how to course title, and the date. The cover page and entries, the reference page are not included in the required page length. For our purposes, you may omit any abstract page. CONFUCIUS AND ARISTOTLE ON VIRTUE. Confucius and Aristotle on ledc definition Virtue. For the primary purpose of this essay, I settled at the views of adjusting questions Confucius and ledc definition, Aristotle on adjusting the aspect of ledc definition virtue. Entries Questions! The element of win the battle year virtue clearly demonstrates the roles of an adjusting entries questions individual’s character and the ethics that these characters embody in determining or evaluating behavior. It is in ethical theory, other words imperative to acknowledge that the concept of ethics remains an approach that establishes the adjusting entries questions wrongness and rightness of an act. It is essential to establish that both Confucius and Aristotle have varied views that have impacted philosophy in relation to virtue and countries involved in wwi, humanity. One of the primary similarities between these philosophers remains in the fact that they both developed theories that guided individual’s character and ethical behavior in entries questions, relation to morality and countries involved, lived in the same era. This paper consequently seeks to adjusting entries questions, establish the similarities and differences in Confucius and Aristotle’s ideologies in regards to ethical character. On the other hand, the paper details the differences between the ancient Chinese and the Modern Greek cultures and suggests ideas on how virtue may be applied within a diverse work environment. As detailed, the pak health centre beliefs and practice of Aristotle and questions, Confucius have shaped our society and the manner in which individuals conduct and behave towards ea.<